
Montana teen Cherice Morales committed suicide following a sexual relationship with her teacher. (New York Daily News)
(Updated below)
Fifty-four-year-old Stacey Dean Rambold, a former high school teacher in Montana, was sentenced to 30 days in prison for raping 14-year-old Cherice Morales. That’s right, just 30 days.
Auliea Hanlon, the victim’s mother, testified that the abuse her daughter suffered at the hands of Rambold was a “major factor” in her suicide. Morales killed herself in 2010, just weeks before her 17th birthday.
But Yellowstone County Judge G. Todd Baugh didn’t see it that way. He sentenced Rambold to 15 years in prison but suspended almost the entire sentence, reasoning that Morales, while troubled, “was older than her chronological age” and was “as much in control of the situation” as Rambold.

Former Montana teacher Stacey Rambold was ordered to spend 30 days in jail for raping a 14-year-old girl who later committed suicide. (New York Daily News)
While the sentence was handed down, Hanlon repeatedly screamed, “You people suck!” I only wish I could have been there to shout with her.
A couple of media reports mention an ongoing sexual relationship between Rambold and Morales. But if this was statutory rape, we are talking about a minor who legally could not give consent even if she wanted to.
What’s even worse is this isn’t the first time Rambold was let off easy. This case goes all the way back to 2008, when Rambold was initially charged with three counts of “sexual intercourse without consent.” The Billings Gazette reports:
While the case was pending, and a few weeks before her 17th birthday, Morales took her own life.
The girl’s death caused problems for the prosecution, and in July 2010 Rambold entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the Yellowstone County Attorney’s Office.
The agreement called for prosecutors to put the case on hold for three years. The charges would be dismissed, the agreement stated, if Rambold completed a sex offender treatment program and complied with other conditions.
A “sex offender treatment program”? Seriously? This guy isn’t an alcoholic who needs AA, he’s a rapist who needs to be held accountable not only for justice for Morales, but also to stop him from raping again. Especially given his history of inappropriate contact with students.
“In 2004, Senior High principal Scott Anderson met with Rambold to discuss allegations that he touched a girls thigh and waist, and was told to keep ‘his hands off all students’,” reported KTVQ in 2008. “The court affidavit says Anderson warned Rambold, ‘anything further would result in a formal investigation and a copy in his personnel file.'”
Needless to say, the sex offender course didn’t work out:
The case was revived last December, when prosecutors learned that Rambold had been terminated from the sex offender treatment program.
On Monday, the treatment provider, Michael Sullivan, testified that Rambold was terminated from the program last November after completing two of the three treatment phases.
Problems arose last August, Sullivan said, when Rambold began missing meetings. After meeting with Rambold, Sullivan said, the man appeared to be back on track with his treatment.
But he was terminated from the program in November, when it was learned that he had been having unsupervised visits with minors and had not informed his counselors that he had been having sexual relations with a woman.
The violations were serious enough when taken together to kick Rambold out of the program, although it was learned that the minors Rambold was visiting were family members.
Rambold’s attorney, Jay Lansing, argued Monday for the suspended sentence. He said Rambold lost his career, his marriage and his home and has suffered a “scarlet letter of the Internet” as a result of publicity about the case.
Looks like the judge agreed that Rambold’s personal life falling apart was punishment enough for destroying a girl’s life, a girl the judge feels was equally responsible for her own sexual abuse at the hands of a grown man. Looks like “rape culture” wins again.
UPDATE 1:
JakPen, who commented below, has started a petition to have Yellowstone District Judge G. Todd Baugh removed from the bench, arguing, “Teachers need to know that they cannot use their position of power and influence to target the students that they are entrusted with. Judges need to know that they are responsible to public safety and not as an enabler of predators!” You can sign here.
UPDATE 2:
Judge G. Todd Baugh has apologized for saying 14-year-old Morales was more mature than her age let on and that she had an equal amount of control over the situation as the teacher who raped her.
Baugh said Wednesday morning he regrets the statements he made during the court hearing. He also submitted a letter to the editor for publication in The Gazette, stating he is “not sure just what I was attempting to say, but it did not come out correct.”
“What I said is demeaning of all women, not what I believe and irrelevant to the sentencing,” Baugh said in the letter. “My apologies to all my fellow citizens.”
Baugh said he plans to write an addendum to the court file this week explaining his reasons for the sentence he imposed more thoroughly.
Still, Baugh stands by the 30-day sentence handed down to former teacher and rapist, Stacey Dean Rambold. So, while his apology is appreciated, the problem hasn’t actually been resolved.
To those of you who signed petitions and planned protests, this judge apologized because of you, proving that collective action can make a difference. Remember that going forward.
I am so upset, I started a petition
Please sign so we can get this man off the bench!!
http://www.change.org/petitions/federal-government-remove-judge-g-todd-baugh-from-the-bench
August 27, 2013 at 8:17 pmI gladly signed it, and circulated it to my network via Twitter and Facebook.
August 27, 2013 at 8:45 pmWould you be as upset if it were a female faculty member having sex with a male student, and would be motivated to for a petition over that?
August 27, 2013 at 9:26 pmIt troubles me that you aren’t very upset by this case, but more concerned about phantom female predators.
August 27, 2013 at 10:19 pmNot phantom, actual.
Check this out for just a handful of cases:
http://www.politicsforum.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=145400
Not only do female adults that rape male minors often see little to no jail time, to rub salt into the wounds, the male victims are also often required to pay child support!
It’s a filthy double standard.
September 25, 2013 at 1:10 pmYou are missing the point of the whole article. The author is trying to expose a gross case of injustice, committed by the judge to presiding over this case. How can you possibly think that a 30 day sentence is appropriate for the rape of a teenage girl?
August 28, 2013 at 1:56 amI don’t think she was raped. I don’t believe in the concept of statutory rape. She was attracted to someone and she had sex. She then killed herself probably because they guy who brought some joy into her life wasn’t with her anymore. Its deeply tragic and its a sick sick and deluded society that criminalizes this individual. The teacher is good man who did a tremendously good thing by sexually healing a troubled teen. He deserves our praise for his tremendous love.
September 1, 2013 at 10:56 pmAre you for real? You are in serious need of deep psychological counseling for even posting this deranged sexist comment. It’s guys like you with this sick type of mentality that makes all of us look bad. Please get over it!
September 1, 2013 at 11:13 pmThere’s a certain irony here: no I wouldn’t be as upset — but that’s precisely because I have some very sexist attitudes.
…and that really gets to my point. It’s almost impossible to find what happened here acceptable. It doesn’t matter what one’s perspective is.
Sometimes things are just wrong. This is one of those times. The girl was fourteen, and now she’s dead.
August 28, 2013 at 8:00 pmThe only “sex offender treatment program” that I ever knew to be 100% effective is castration. The people that live in this area, who may be outraged by this judges outdated dinosaur attitude, should start some type of movement to have him recalled.
August 27, 2013 at 8:31 pmSo would you be in favor of castrating a female faculty member in a high school who has sex with a male student, since you advocate for castration for one who violates statutory laws?
August 27, 2013 at 9:28 pmUsually, female teachers who have sex with a male student, even though that is wrong, doesn’t commit rape. This teacher raped this young girl student by force. That’s a totally different thing than just having sex. To answer your question, yes, I would castrate a female, if that were physically possible.
For some reason, you don’t seem to know the difference between having sex and rape. That’s pretty disturbing!
August 28, 2013 at 2:04 amIt was statutory rape. Nevertheless, Rambold is a sexual predator who preys on 16 year old girls and should be serving his entire 15 year sentence.
August 28, 2013 at 8:27 amThere is zero evidence he used force.
September 1, 2013 at 10:57 pmIt depends on what one defines as force. Physical, or violet force is the most harsh and direct type, but there are different types of what can be defined as force. There is force by intimidation and/or threats. Heavy coercion, something that young people are heavily affected by, is another type of force. There is also emotional and psychological force. Even though there is proof that he used no physical force, he surely used the other types that I have listed.
September 2, 2013 at 12:14 amReblogged this on Crippled Politics and commented:
Just when you think that injustice in the United States can’t get any worse, it does. This was just about one of the grossest miscarriages of justice that I have heard of in quite a while, except for maybe the Trayvon Martin.
There is a petition attached to this original blog post, in the comment section, to have the judge who presided over this case removed from the bench. Please sign it!
August 27, 2013 at 8:51 pmRania, you are very disingenuous with this article. You are reporting on this story with such veracity, and yet you have nothing to say about all the female faculty members of high schools, who get caught having sex with their male students, and most times they don’t get any legal punishment at all, and the ones that do get very probation at the most.
And there are cases where female faculty members of high schools have sex with their male students, get pregnant, and the young man is forced to pay legal extortion known as child support, mighty funny you’re not reporting on that either.
The only reason you are so fired up about this story is because it’s a male faculty member in a high school and a female student, and he’s probably the only one who has not become a captive of the prison industrial complex for a sex act.
If you really did believe in people being punished for violating laws as much as you claim to, than you would be reporting on these female faculty members in high schools who have sex with their male students, and the vast majority of them get no more than probation, and most cases don’t even get that.
You are a hypocrite, and your hypocrisy is showing very clearly!
As to the girl committing suicide, that was her choice.
August 27, 2013 at 9:25 pmGood grief. If you are so concerned about predatory females, please provide all of us with some cases that need attention.
The fact is, the majority of predators of male. You can’t change this fact. 1%-4% of predators are female. The majority of victims are female, and between the ages of 16-19. It doesn’t lessen or belittle male victims, but to act like there is an epidemic of predatory females is ridiculous.
And to berate the blog author for not having the time to report every single case of female sexual abuse is absurd. Women are the berated underclass, not men.
August 27, 2013 at 10:18 pmTruly terrible case and frankly disgusting judge. I feel for that poor girl. It is awful. But I do find your last sentence here distasteful, albeit you are dealing with a very unpleasant individual. However, pretending women are an underclass is not relevant and farcical.
August 28, 2013 at 3:52 am“please provide all of us with some cases that need attention.”
Gladly…
http://www.politicsforum.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=145400
September 25, 2013 at 1:13 pmTruly horrific. Poor girl.
August 28, 2013 at 3:48 amhorrible. US legal system needs a revision.
August 28, 2013 at 4:11 amsoooooo sickening
one minor typo I noticed in this sentence: “Keep in mind that we are talking about a minor who legally could not give consent even if she wanted too because she was a minor.” “too” should be “to”
August 28, 2013 at 9:50 amThis whole situation is disgusting, but I really can’t get past “This case goes all the way back to 2008, when Rambold was initially charged with three counts of ‘sexual intercourse without consent.'”
He was charged with “sexual intercourse without consent.” There is already a fucking word for that.
I know that rape isn’t something I should ever condone, but I really hope the other men in prison make those 30 days hell for him.
August 28, 2013 at 12:03 pmDoreen,
Your anti male disposition, and hypocrisy are shining through clearly.
First of all, anal penetration is NOT sex, the rectum is NOT a sexual organ, and should never be used that way, that is why I don’t support the same gender community, and find the activities you advocate for that go on in male prisons revolting. Any male who is actually able to get an erection from the sight of a rectum has got some kind of chemical imbalance in his brain, and needs treatment, and yes I am all for putting that back into the DSM.
Second, if you so fascinated with anal penetration, than go take advantage of surgery technology, turn yourself into a male, commit a crime, make sure and get caught, plead guilty, and once you become a captive of the prison industrial in a male concentration camp, you can all the anal penetration you want.
August 28, 2013 at 7:43 pmYou are the poster child of the rape culture. You deny its existence and bemoan the poor men who are so misunderstood. As to your graphic comments regarding what is sexual and what is not, you misunderstand the nature of rape. It is not about sex, it is about power, control, with an over-riding sense of misogyny.
I suggest you get some psychological help and between now and then keep your hateful, trollish ideas to yourself. You add nothing to a conversation except to make clear why attitudes regarding women, respect, and empathy (which you seem to have none) need to change if we as a society are going to flourish.
August 29, 2013 at 11:56 pmYou are not coming from a scientific reference so nothing you had to say is of any relevance, you are simply repeating tired talking points from the MSM. Make a scientific argument, wen can talk, no political deflection, no talking points from either the fake liberal, or fake conservative MSM, just scientific factual argument. Until then I can not take you seriously.
I am at this time going to address one thing you said, and I’m directly quoting you:
“now and then keep your hateful, trollish ideas to yourself.”
Neither you, nor anyone else had any right to tell anyone to express themselves, you don’t like what someone has to say, you’re free to rebut it, try to engage them in a debate, or simply ignore it, you however, have absolutely NO right to tell anyone not to express themselves. Freedom of speech does NOT only apply when it’s speech you agree with!
August 30, 2013 at 2:19 amMy suggestion was just that… a suggestion. And I stand behind my recommendation. Furthermore, unless I actually take action that prevents you from speaking, your “free speech” position cannot be taken seriously. However, you were correct in exactly one thing you said. I can choose to ignore you…
August 30, 2013 at 10:22 amI can’t understand how these evil men (rapist and judge) can live with themselves. I’m stunned and not sure what to say or think. And while all this is going on, there are men and women serving 30-year prison sentences because of drug offenses under so-called bogus “zero-tolerance” laws. And there are school children being expelled from school (longer than 30 days) for bringing a toy fluorescent water gun to school.
August 28, 2013 at 5:14 pmI’m usually on the other side of these things, but fourteen is fourteen, it’s not seventeen, a teacher is in a position of authority, and the girl did kill herself.
Thirty days does seem awfully light.
August 28, 2013 at 7:52 pmAt the end of the day, one has to wonder.
If this had been the judge’s daughter, would he have regarded thirty days as an appropriate sentence?
August 28, 2013 at 7:55 pmWhy does it matter? It’s no one elses business.And go ahead, thumb me down for having a damn opinion. No one is going to care by next year. So there is no point.
August 28, 2013 at 11:23 pmWhat exactly is your opinion?
August 28, 2013 at 11:25 pmMy opinion is that people shouldn’t care that some girl killed herself when A), people die every day that don’t get the recognition they deserve and
B) people have lived through much worse and haven’t offed themselves.
Do you honestly think if I killed myself, I’m make national news? Hell no.
It isn’t fair that if I were to die, or if my mother or brother or friend or uncle were to die, you wouldn’t hear a thing about it, save for maybe an obituary in a newspaper no one reads. But when some girl that hasn’t done anything noteable before hand kills herself, the whole country is in uproar. It’s stupid.
August 28, 2013 at 11:30 pmYeah, you’re right. Only people who commit suicide after doing something “noteable before hand” deserve any public notice, let alone outrage. Like, for instance, Pierre Wauthier, the chief financial officer of Zurich Insurance Group, who killed himself last week because, as he complained in his suicide note, he was “badly treated” and “not valued” by Josef Ackermann, the company’s high-profile former chairman.
I mean, Wauthier’s suicide really *worked*, because Ackermann resigned and was probably kind of embarrassed after the suicide was made public.
I mean, unless you’re *important* you’re really wasting your time by doing yourself in. Cherice Morales got lucky because a) she was raped by a guy who was given a measly 30-day sentence and b) the judge in her case helped her out by making some deeply callous remarks.
The rest of you should consider yourself on notice: don’t count on M or anyone else to care at all about your suicide unless you’ve done something “noteable before hand”. Because you really can’t count on others to bring attention to your death by displaying heroic insensitivity to it.
September 3, 2013 at 4:57 pmM, If I could thumbs you up 1,000 times I would!! I have more to say, and I will get back to you, I have to do something right now though.
August 28, 2013 at 11:47 pm[…] various crimes, mostly drug-related? If we’re such a big guardian of justice, how does a teacher in Montana only get sentenced to 30 days in jail for raping a female student who later committed suicide because of it? Lastly, if we’re such a guardian of democracy, […]
August 29, 2013 at 2:23 amSome of the comments on this blog are just as disgusting as the judge’s.
August 29, 2013 at 6:45 amI’m not excusing his behavior, but most of these female teachers get a slap on the wrist just like he did.
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/pictures/view/83515734/
September 6, 2013 at 4:53 pm