Since the manhunt for former police officer turned cop-killer Chris Dorner started, the establishment media has expressed shock and confusion at the level of animosity directed at the Los Angeles Police Department. Some have even equated this animosity with support for Dorner’s killing spree.
In a piece titled “Fugitive’s Rant Puts Focus on Evolving LAPD Legacy, the Associated Press reports, that Dorner’s vendetta “comes at a time when it’s widely held that the police department has evolved well beyond the troubled racial legacy of Rodney King and the O.J. Simpson trial.” And what is the evidence for this apparent evolution? It’s that “Whites now make up roughly a third of the department and, while under federal authority, LAPD moved to require anti-gang and narcotics officers to disclose their finances and worked on new tools to track officer conduct.”
The AP should tell that to the family of 36-year-old Jose de la Trinidad, an unarmed Latino father of two who was shot dead in November by two Los Angeles Sheriff’s Deputies.
The Sheriff’s department tried to cover it up, claiming that the officers opened fire because de la Trinidad reached for his waist to obtain what they believed was a gun. Little did they know that a nearby resident saw the entire thing from her bedroom window. She told investigators that de la Trinidad was complying with police orders, with his hands over his head and his back turned, when he was shot several times in the back execution style. Police initially denied they ever interviewed the witness until they were grilled by the media and forced to admit they did.
On top of that, de la Trinidad’s autopsy report was released last week showing that he was indeed shot in the back. He leaves behind a wife, Rosanna, and two daughters ages 3 and 6. Three days after her husband was killed, Rosanna asked, “How am I supposed to explain to my daughters that their father was murdered by the police, the people who they are supposed to go to for protection.”
Perhaps Rosanna’s daughter’s will feel better knowing that, as the AP so kindly reminds us, “Whites now make up roughly a third of the department and, while under federal authority, LAPD moved to require anti-gang and narcotics officers to disclose their finances and worked on new tools to track officer conduct.”
Southern California law enforcement may be more racially diverse, but that doesn’t mean their culture of violence towards poor black and brown communities has changed nor has the “code of silence” that protects trigger-happy officers who are almost never disciplined for their actions.
For example, nothing has happened to the eight LAPD officers who fired more than 90 rounds at unarmed 19-year-old Abdul Arian as he ran away following a car chase last year. An LAPD internal probe deemed the 2010 police killing of Steven Eugene Washington, a 27-year-old unarmed autistic black man, justified as well. The LAPD officers who in 2011 shot and killed 25-year-old Reggie Doucet, naked and unarmed at the time, were also cleared of any wrongdoing. The LAPD has yet to even release the name of a man who police shot and killed in October as he was handcuffed and lying on the ground face down.
In all of these cases police claimed the suspect was reaching for his waistband (except in the case of naked Reggie Doucet who they say reached for the officer’s gun) and like magic their actions were justified.
Then there’s the LAPD’s latest scandal involving an elite gang unit that promoted brutality and celebrated shootings. Last year, the Los Angles Times outed the existence of the “Jump Out Boys“, a secret group formed by seven LA Sheriff’s Department deputies and, according to Voxxi, “prides itself on aggressive policing, much of it in Latino communities, and brands its members with matching tattoos of a red-eyed oversized skull bearing the clique acronym and a bony hand holding a revolver.
Though the seven officers are being fired, Voxxi notes that it’s not “for any known criminal behavior but apparently for tarnishing the department’s reputation and unethical conduct at a time when it is struggling through a federal investigation.”
It’s no wonder poor communities and communities of color see the LAPD as a threat to be feared rather than the angelic department of do-gooders portrayed in the media. Meanwhile, despite all the brutality, killing and cover-ups, the corporate media can’t seem to understand why a large number of people dislike the LAPD even as they’re being hunted by one of their own.
This confusion is illustrated best by the AP, which portrays a Facebook page as supportive of Dorner despite an explicit statement to the contrary:
On Friday, a community of online sympathizers formed, echoing complaints against police that linger in some communities. One Facebook page supporting Dorner, which had over 2,300 fans by Friday evening, said “this is not a page about supporting the killing of innocent people. It’s supporting fighting back against corrupt cops and bringing to light what they do.”
It is possible to both denounce Chris Dorner’s actions while also acknowledging the many truths in his critique of the LAPD. The establishment media doesn’t seem to get this. Instead, they see any agreement with Dorner’s assessment as tantamount to backing the murder of police officers, a mentality that’s not only foolish but also indifferent to the people who have suffered at the hands of police violence.
It’s easy to attribute a shooting rampage to the lunacy of a deranged individual, which for the most part is correct. But dismissing his motives ensures that the systemic cultural factors that led him to such cold desperation will continue.
Rania: You are spot on. I 2009 LAPD paid out a $12.85 million settlement to demonstrators who were assaulted during a peaceful assembly at a May Day march. The massive corruption scandal known as “Ramparts” netted a mere $75.5 million to hundreds of people wrongfully targetted and falsely accused. Last month was noteworthy for two gigantic cases against LAPD that ended in favor of plaintiffs. There was an $8.75 million excessive force verdict when a host of LAPD officers unloaded their guns into a DUI suspect. Then there was the $19.2 million payout to a kid who possessed a – get this – pellet gun. That’s just a microcosm of what occurs every day in LA (and in my hometown of San Diego).
What’s even more prevalent is the subterfuge going on behind the scenes. For example, last year a San Diego grand jury released a scathing report identifying how SDPD Internal Affairs officers bullied members of the supposedly independent Citizens Review Advisory Board. The CRAB is supposed to be an independent body reviewing police brutality claims. IA officers bullied board members into exonnerating cops. See, http://www.kpbs.org/news/2012/may/22/grand-jury-issues-scathing-report-citizens-review-/
Several of the IA cops who are part of the problem with CRAB have exonnerated cops who assaulted and falsely arrested my clients amidst mountains of evidence of misconduct. It seems that when some officers receive their badges, they leave ethics at the door. It also seems that those officers who leave their ethics at the door, are those most likely to succeed.
Your quote, “It is possible to both denounce Chris Dorner’s actions while also acknowledging the many truths in his critique of the LAPD” is spot on.
I had no idea San Diego police were so belligerent. Maybe it’s just me but they don’t seem to get that much attention in the news. I think one of the biggest problems is that we allow law enforcement agencies to police themselves and independent review boards are pointless unless they actually have some authority to discipline misconduct.
It amazes me that cities are willing to keep on aggressive officers in spite if the amount of money they cost them in law suits.
The power of the police unions is high. I have, however, seen a shift in public sentiment in recent years away from supporting cops, to challenging them. It’s a slow process. I think of the LA Times did an exposé on it, it would be meaningful. Another problem is the prosecutors and judges who support bad cops. Judges are elected, and they always run on tickets proclaiming, “Supported by Law Enforcement.” DA’s are scared to challenge dirty cops. It’s the scare tactics they use against the public. Just like the scare tactics Bush used when he ran the second time. Scare the masses, and make them your sheeple.
The power of the police unions is high. I have, however, seen a shift in public sentiment in recent years away from supporting cops, to challenging them. It’s a slow process. I think of the LA Times did an exposé on it, it would be meaningful. Another problem is the prosecutors and judges who support bad cops. Judges are elected, and they always run on tickets proclaiming, “Supported by Law Enforcement.” DA’s are scared to challenge dirty cops. It’s the scare tactics they use against the public. Just like the scare tactics Bush used when he ran the second time. Scare the masses, and make them your sheeple.
When it comes to actually risking their lives to protect those in immediate danger, trained cops are often the biggest cowards in the world . Witness the behavior of the local swat team in the Columbine massacre. They didnt dare to enter the school building until all the shooting had stopped , citing the possibitiy of planted booby traps as an excuse. Said one mother of a student who survived the shooting…..”The police were lying when they claimed to save the lives of the remaining students. Those students saved themselves.”
What was the race of the cops involved in the shootings ?
What where the race of the cops in ramparts scandal ?
And why are their so may illegals in California ?
And gangs ?
Hi Ire – there are many undocumented people in CA because of things like so called trade policy and the drug war that displace many people from Latin America. Also US law leaves out agriculture from many of the worker protections found in other areas. And of course, the numerous punitive measures people often seek are only effective at producing misery (including for children or citizens who look like they might lack papers) but don’t reduce migration by undocumented people. In fact, walls and the rest are far better at keeping people in then out.
What was the race of the cops involved in the shootings ?
What where the race of the cops in ramparts scandal ?
And why are their so may illegals in California ?
And gangs ?
Hi Ire – there are many undocumented people in CA because of things like so called trade policy and the drug war that displace many people from Latin America. Also US law leaves out agriculture from many of the worker protections found in other areas. And of course, the numerous punitive measures people often seek are only effective at producing misery (including for children or citizens who look like they might lack papers) but don’t reduce migration by undocumented people. In fact, walls and the rest are far better at keeping people in then out.
Reblogged this on eco communism in cascadia.
Reblogged this on eco communism in cascadia.
It was fun watching the mayor of Los Angeles talk about transparency in LAPD when in fact the culture that makes them dangerous still exist. My favorite overheard officer saying when dealing with crowds (riot), “I can’t wait to smash heads.” As a citizen I was appalled. It is not freedom of speech when they are supposed to protect the public, but look at us as sport.
Woman of color
[…] On top of that, none of the three people “mistaken” for Dorner received any warning from police, suggesting a “shoot to kill” mentality was at work here. Many have defended this by arguing that law enforcement was under extreme pressure because they were being targeted. My answer to that is, it doesn’t fucking matter! The law applies even when police are faced with a cop-killer end of story. More importantly, this behavior isn’t exclusive to the Dorner situation. Police in southern California have a lengthy history of “shoot first, ask questions later” type policing, which I wrote about here. […]
[…] On top of that, none of the three people “mistaken” for Dorner received any warning from police, suggesting a “shoot to kill” mentality was at work here. Many have defended this by arguing that law enforcement was under extreme pressure because they were being targeted. My answer to that is, it doesn’t fucking matter! The law applies even when police are faced with a cop-killer end of story. More importantly, this behavior isn’t exclusive to the Dorner situation. Police in southern California have a lengthy history of “shoot first, ask questions later” type policing, which I wrote about here. […]