Skip to content

Jury: Police Killing Of Unarmed Anaheim Man Justified Because Victim Dressed Like Gang Member

Manuel Diaz with his daughter in undated family photo.

Manuel Diaz with his daughter in undated family photo. (OC Weekly)

On July 27, 2012, 24-year-old Manuel Diaz was shot in the back of the head by Anaheim police officer Nick Bennallack. Officers then stood over Diaz, who was unarmed, for three minutes, watching him twitch and bleed out before doing anything. It was an execution.

Almost two years later, a federal jury has rejected a lawsuit against the officer and the city filed by Diaz’s mother claiming police used excessive force. Why? Because it happened in a neighborhood where there are gangs and Diaz was, according to police, dressed like a “gang member”.

As the OC Register reports (emphasis mine):

One of the jurors said that on Anna Drive, where the shooting happened, police could reasonably expect that a man dressed like a gang member and running from them could have a gun. The neighborhood is claimed by an Anaheim gang that was at the center of a multiagency firearms and narcotics investigation.

In other words, had this happened in an upper-class suburban neighborhood free of gang activity, perhaps then it would qualify as excessive force. But in the working class and poor Latino neighborhoods of Anaheim, young men like Diaz are fair game for police execution, armed or not (Diaz was not).

Humberto Guizar, the Diaz family attorney, called the jury’s decision, “ an indictment on the community,” adding, “They denied him justice because of where he lived.”

The jury, comprised of six men and two women (four white, three Latino and one Asian), deliberated for just two hours before reaffirming the long held belief that unarmed Latino men are disposable.

To be clear, “gang member” is code for nonwhite, usually black or Latino. Immediately after Diaz was killed, Anaheim police (in between shooting rubber bullets at women and children protesting the killing) painted him as a gang member who despite being unarmed probably did something to deserve his fate. And it worked. The cop who killed Diaz was cleared of any wrongdoing by the city. All that was left was this lawsuit brought forth by Diaz’s grieving mother. She plans to appeal.

About these ads
9 Comments
  1. Hi there to every one, its actually a fastidious for me to go to see this web site, it contains important Information.

    March 7, 2014
  2. Mark Haywood #

    You should do a write up on the beating death of Thomas Kelly at the hands of two Fullerton cops who were acquitted by the jury. This young man was deliberately provoked into running for his life and then murdered because he was defenseless and homeless . So the cops were fired, the mayor of the town resigned, the police chief resigned, and Kelly’s mother was awarded a million dollars for his wanton killing, and yet the jury still found the cops innocent of any wrongdoing. Can anyone explain this gross and outrageous miscarriage of justice to me?

    March 7, 2014
  3. Peter Hindrup #

    Yes Mark: at least here in NSW, Australia, things are worse than they were before the 1960’s, and police can do no wrong.

    ANY non compliance, back chat, and the police gose for either their Tassers, or their guns.

    No penalties are ever handed out.

    March 7, 2014
  4. Unbelievable that it just keeps getting worse. What will the end look like?

    March 7, 2014
  5. martin k. johnson #

    Shouldn’t have ran from cops. Shouldn’t have been a criminal. Now you’re dead.

    March 8, 2014
    • martin k. johnson #

      Anyone care to tell why they thumb downed this?

      March 10, 2014
  6. This has to stop and we all have to make it stop with all our hearts…

    March 18, 2014
    • martin k. johnson #

      Mexicans should stop being filthy gangbangers then it would stop

      March 19, 2014
  7. Chris #

    What else is new. Another wholly one-sided depiction, where the facts are twisted to meet whatever agenda you’re pushing. You don’t mention that he was concealing his hands, or that he had convictions for pushing drugs, carrying guns, or being a member of a criminal street gang. Let’s not shed too many tears for this gangbanger.

    March 28, 2014

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 40,859 other followers

%d bloggers like this: