Skip to content

In War Games, Navy SEALs Normalize Treating U.S. Citizens as Enemy

United States Navy SEALs planned war games in the state of Washington for mid-January, where they would encroach upon residential areas, state parks, national parks, etc, without the consent of the public. The war games treat citizens as pawns because SEALs were trained to react to citizens as potential terrorists.

One of the most alarming aspects of the war games, which were reported on by Truthout journalist Dahr Jamail, is how it normalizes the idea that U.S. citizens can be enemies. The war games suggest a future where many more military exercises run roughshod over public spaces and soldiers simulate how citizens could pose a danger to them.

Now, the weekly podcast, “Unauthorized Disclosure,” returns for a third season. Our guest this week is Jamail, who talks about documents he obtained from a source within the Navy. He describes how the Navy circumvented the process so the public would not be able to object to plans. It excluded clandestine trainings from regulations requiring environmental impact statements. “Peace parks” in Washington would be violated by the military. Jamail also talks about some of his other extensive reporting on climate disruption, including the melting of the Arctic.

In the discussion portion, hosts Kevin Gosztola and Rania Khalek recap the past few weeks of 2016 and talk about Guantanamo, Obama’s State of the Union speech, and U.S. government raids and deportations against refugees from Central America.

The podcast is available for download on iTunes. For a link to the episode (and also to download it as well), go here.

Below is a partial transcript of the interview with Dahr Jamail.

Read more

Year-End Episode of ‘Unauthorized Disclosure’: A Look Back at 2015

All throughout the year, we have enjoyed producing weekly episodes of our podcast, “Unauthorized Disclosure.” Each guest has brought incredible insight to issues and topics, which we believe deserve widespread discussion and are often under addressed in the establishment media. But this is our final episode of 2015.

Roqayah Chamseddine, a writer and someone who currently works at “The Empire Files” with Abby Martin, joins the “Unauthorized Disclosure” podcast as a guest co-host (again).

For the first half of the hour-long episode, we talk about the GOP debate, which happened last week because it perfectly encapsulates a lot of what was wrong with this year. We shift to discussion about ISIS and Islamophobia. (In fact, some of our discussion may sound like what Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders said during the Saturday night debate when asked about the bigotry Donald Trump and other GOP candidates are fueling.)

We spend some time talking about the issue of climate change and how once again we’re horrified that what needs to be done is not being done by the U.S. government and other world powers. The statistics for how bad things will get continue to be stunning. Plus, our media and politicians spend very little time giving climate change the attention it truly merits.

The podcast is available for download on iTunes. For a link to the episode (and also to download it as well), go here. Click on “go here” and a page will load with the audio file of the podcast. The file will automatically start playing so you can listen to the episode.

If you enjoy the podcast, help us keep the show going by donating to support the next season of “Unauthorized Disclosure.”

Below are some highlights from the year-end episode:

Read more

Donald Trump, anti-Muslim hysteria and the hypocrites who enabled his rise

Crossposted from The Electronic Intifada

Last week’s proposal by Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump to ban Muslims from entering the United States elicited condemnation from across the political spectrum.

Yet his proposal comes after nearly 15 years of anti-Muslim demonization propelled by many of the same figures now distancing themselves from Trump’s opportunistic Muslim-baiting.

It has been truly stunning to watch people who have directly contributed to anti-Muslim prejudice express shock as the hate spirals out of control.

Jeffrey Goldberg, the former Israeli prison guard and national correspondent for The Atlantic magazine, tweeted that he was “astonished” by the volume of Twitter users in his timeline under the impression that every Muslim is a terrorist.

Goldberg should try reading his own shoddy reporting for a clue about where people in his timeline got such an idea.

Notorious for depicting Muslims as uniquely prone to irrational violence, particularly against Jews and Israel, the former fan of the far-right politician Meir Kahane has made a habit of collectively blaming Muslims for failing to rein in extremists.

Of course, Goldberg, who presents himself as the voice of American Jews, has never made a similar demand of his own community — though if he ever did, things might get awkward, since he is one of the extremists.

On top of being a proven liar who helped push the US into invading Iraq, Goldberg is a returning foreign fighter who was radicalized as a teenager at a Zionist summer camp in New York’s Catskills mountains.

In the 1990s he left the United States to join the Israeli military. He served as a prison guard at Ketziot, an Israeli army prison camp in the Naqab (Negev) desert where thousands of Palestinian political prisoners languished during the first intifada.

In his book Prisoners, Goldberg admits that after watching a fellow prison guard beat a Palestinian prisoner unconscious for saying something the guard didn’t like, Goldberg lied to help cover it up.

He also confessed to beating Palestinians himself, though he claims his victims deserved it, writing, “I never hit a Palestinian who wasn’t already hitting me.”

When he wasn’t dishing out beatings to his colonial subjects, Goldberg tortured them in an arbitary manner; he once sent a Palestinian man to solitary confinement because the man refused to recognize Israel as a legitimate state.

Much of Goldberg’s anti-Muslim animus is tied to legitimizing Israel as an exclusivist state.

After the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris earlier this year, Goldberg argued that the Jews of Europe may need to escape to Israel lest they be persecuted by a potentially looming alliance between Europe’s Islamophobic far-right and Muslim extremists.

Given the intense marginalization and disenfranchisement of Muslims across Europe, the notion that Islamists will soon be embraced by the anti-Muslim far-right is ludicrous, to say the least.

More recently, in a piece titled “The paranoid, supremacist roots of the stabbing intifada,” Goldberg attributes the ongoing Palestinian revolt against Israel’s colonial violence to “the unwillingness of many Muslim Palestinians to accept the notion that Jews are a people who are indigenous to the land Palestinians believe to be exclusively their own.”

So according to Goldberg, Muslims who refuse to recognize that he — a white Jewish guy from Long Island, New York — is indigenous to the Middle East, are intolerant extremists. However, Goldberg, an active cheerleader of US aggression who believes he’s biblically entitled to dispossess Palestinians so he can have a spare state, is apparently more rational, objective and civilized than Trump and the backwards people on his Twitter timeline who inexplicably believe all Muslims are terrorists.

Mainstreaming Islamophobia

One of the most disingenuous condemnations of Trump’s proposal came from the Anti-Defamation League, a hardline pro-Israel lobbying outfit that bills itself as a civil rights organization devoted to combatting anti-Semitism.

“Trump’s plan to bar people from entry to the United States based on their religion is unacceptable,” declared Jonathan Greenblatt, the ADL’s national director.

The ADL’s purported opposition to anti-Muslim bigotry is hard to take seriously for a number of reasons, first and foremost being its energetic support for Israel’s religiously discriminatory immigration policy and the right-wing Trump-like leaders that enforce it.

While Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, denounced Trump’s comments, the fact remains that religious tests and blanket bans are standard operating procedure in Israel.

In past decades the ADL has infiltrated and spied on Arab American activists and illegally gathered intelligence on Palestine solidarity and anti-apartheid groups, some of which was passed on to Israeli government officials as well as the white supremacist regime in South Africa.

In more recent years, the ADL has played a crucial role in mainstreaming Islamophobia, often throwing its weight behind smear campaigns spearheaded by a cadre of well-funded Islamophobes who for more than a decade have pumped out disinformation about Muslims and Islam, from which far-right Norwegian mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik drew inspiration.

This Islamophobia network, as the liberal think tank the Center for American Progress labeled it, is funded in large part by wealthy pro-Israel donors and has generated a nationwide freakout about an alleged jihadist threat posed by deceptive US Muslims.

In 2006, the ADL’s foundation gave $2,500 to the virulently anti-Muslim Middle East Forum headed by Daniel Pipes, a prominent ringleader of the Islamophobia network.

The following year, the ADL, then headed by Abraham Foxman, aligned itself with Pipes and the similarly bigoted Frank Gaffney in their anti-Muslim campaign to fire Debbie Almontaser from her position as principal of New York City’s Khalil Gibran International Academy.

In his proposal to ban Muslims from entering the country, Trump cited a debunked poll issued by Gaffney’s Center for Security Policy, a Washington, DC based think tank that, according to the ADL’s own findings, “has pioneered the anti-Sharia hysteria by publishing materials regarding the threat of an Islamic takeover of the US.”

In 2010, the ADL sided with anti-Muslim conspiracy theorists Pamela Geller and Robert Spencerin opposing the construction of a Muslim community center, dubbed “the ground zero mosque,” near the site of the 9/11 attacks in New York City.

In the days prior to Trump’s announcement, right-wing media outlets — including the New York PostDaily Caller, and Breitbart — tried (and failed) to connect the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), a Muslim group based out of Jamaica, Queens, to the Muslim couple who gunned down 14 people in a mass shooting in San Bernardino, California, on 2 December.

To push their theory, right-wing outlets relied on smears advanced by none other than the ADL, which tried in 2010 to portray ICNA as an extremist group due to its criticism of Israel.

By repeatedly siding with anti-Muslim fanatics, the ADL has granted an aura of credibility to the very bigots it has then turned around and condemned.

Meanwhile, as anti-Muslim attacks skyrocket to unprecedented levels, the ADL refuses to engage with the largest Muslim advocacy organization in the country, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, because of CAIR’s outspoken criticism of Israel and support for Palestinian rights.

Bipartisan hate

Donald Trump is “a race-baiting, xenophobic religious bigot” who “doesn’t represent my party,” asserted Republican presidential hopeful Lindsey Graham in response to Trump’s proposed ban on Muslims.

But even as the South Carolina senator, who has scarcely seen a Muslim country he didn’t want to bomb, spoke out against Trump’s bigotry, he continued to spew his own.

Addressing a Jewish audience on Sunday, Graham promised that if elected president he would launch a US military ground invasion and occupation of Iraq and Syria to defeat Islamic State.

“There’s no way to defend freedom without fighting against evil, and there’s never been a bigger evil since World War II than radical Islam,” Graham told the crowd.

While Republicans have been more explicit in their rhetoric, they aren’t alone in pushing anti-Muslim hate.

Democratic Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez of California said last week that “anywhere between 5 and 20 percent” of Muslims “have a desire for a caliphate” and are prepared “to institute that in any way possible,” including through violence and terrorism.

Faced with intense criticism for her wild assertion, Sanchez, who sits on the homeland security committee in the House of Representatives, refused to apologize or back down. Instead she sourced her claim to a book by Maajid Nawaz and Sam Harris titled Islam and the Future of Tolerance: A Dialogue.

In it, Harris and Nawaz speculate about what they believe to be the percentage of Islamists worldwide but they say nothing about the desire for a caliphate that Sanchez was referring to.

Nawaz and Harris are notorious for trafficking in the kind of propaganda that provides a theoretical backbone to a more sophisticated style of Islamophobia that appeals to liberals.

Harris, a neuroscientist with a pathological obsession with Islam, has made a career out of preaching anti-Muslim venom under the guise of liberal atheism.

As for Nawaz, a self-styled ex-Islamist and rising star in the Islamophobia industry, he runs the Quilliam Foundation, an influential London-based counter-extremism think tank that receives significant funding from neoconservatives in the US.

Under Nawaz’s guidance, Quilliam helped shape the UK’s counter-radicalization program, Prevent, which brands Muslim schoolchildren and workers in the public sector as potential terrorists for expressing support for Palestine, growing a beard or criticizing the UK’s foreign policy.

That’s why it is strange to see Nawaz, of all people, feigning concern about Trump’s proposal.

Islamophobia is about more than just reactionary hate and bigotry; it’s necessary for legitimizing US aggression in the Middle East. That’s why weapons companies that profit from endless war are among its key funders.

In other words, meaningful opposition to Islamophobia demands principled rejection of the bipartisan US war machine that profits from it.

Trump is an opportunistic demagogue exploiting the very real economic anxieties of white working class Americans with a politics of bigotry. But many of the people loudly condemning him helped set the stage for his rise. We shouldn’t let them off the hook.

Podcast: Donald Trump, ISIS, and How ‘Militarized Identity Politics’ Fuels Hatred and War

Multiple supporters of GOP candidate Donald Trump were given airtime in the media to argue in support of his call to ban Muslims from entering the United States. Fortunately, CNN invited someone on to their cable news network to explain how supporters of Trump have been scared into thinking “crazy Muslims” are going to kill us all.

“The statistics tell a very different story since 9/11. Around 40 people have been killed by Muslim terrorists in the United States. Around 400,000 have been killed in gun crime as a whole,” Arun Kundnani, author of “The Muslims Are Coming! Islamophobia, Extremism, and the Domestic War on Terror,” explained.

Kundnani had conservative commentator Kurt Schlichter foaming at the mouth after he suggested Trump is not brave for speaking out against Muslims but rather it is average American Muslims, who ride the subway or drive cabs, that are brave. A CNN anchor requested he provide facts when accusing a “large number of Muslims” of believing in violent extremism. He was livid and said, “You want me to Google it right now?”

On this week’s episode of the “Unauthorized Disclosure” podcast, Kundnani joins the “Unauthorized Disclosure” podcast to expand on many of the comments he made about Trump’s call to ban Muslims. Kundnani describes how the American “War on Terrorism” reinforces hatred toward Muslims and Arabs. He offers an analysis of the Islamic State and how they are drawn to a fight they believe is between the West and Islam. He also assesses failures to counter certain narratives around the Islamic State as well as nationalist perspectives, which are now promoted by Trump.

During the discussion, the show’s hosts, Rania Khalek and Kevin Gosztola, talk about the infamous Warden Burl Cain resigning from the Angola penitentiary and Rahm Emanuel and police brutality in Chicago.

The podcast is available on iTunes for download. For a link (and also to download the episode), go here. Click on “go here” and a page will load with the audio file of the podcast. The file will automatically start playing so you can listen to the episode.

If you enjoy the podcast, help make the next season of “Unauthorized Disclosure” possible by donating here.

Below is a partial transcript of the interview with Arun Kundnani.

Read more

Podcast: France canceled climate protest—but not weapons expo—after Paris attacks

In the aftermath of the attacks in Paris, numerous American Muslims or U.S. citizens, who have brown skin, live in fear of what might happen if they go out in public. There have been several reported hate crimes. One mosque was vandalized by a ripped up Quran covered in feces. Right-wing protesters armed with shotguns and rifles stalked a mosque in Irving, Texas, on November 21.

Passengers are informing gate agents, who work for airlines like Spirit or Southwest, that they are afraid to fly with brown people. Airlines and airport security are enabling this racist hysteria by removing them from flights. In one case, even though the individuals were completely harmless to other passengers, they were booked on another flight. The Islamohpobia of passengers won out.

Journalist Todd Miller is this week’s guest on the “Unauthorized Disclosure” podcast. He recently returned from France, where he attended a major weapons expo called Milipol and witnessed the French security state’s crackdown on climate activists during COP21.

Miller recalls being chased by French police, who enforced a ban against demonstrations instituted in the wake of the Paris attacks. He describes the detestable scene at the expo just days after the attacks, where companies were eager to use the Paris attacks and even exploit the fear of refugees to sell their products. He also highlights his recent reporting at the U.S.-Mexico border on how the U.S. Border Patrol has turned indigenous American land into a war zone.

During the discussion part of the show, Rania Khalek and Kevin Gosztola announce a year-end fundraiser to raise money for Season 3 of the “Unauthorized Disclosure” podcast. The hosts also talk about the San Bernardino shooting and how the media swarmed the shooters’ home and effectively tampered with the scene. Finally, the hosts share their reviews of Spike Lee’s new film, “Chi-Raq.”

The podcast is available on iTunes for download. For a link (and also to download the episode), go here. Click on “go here” and a page will load with the audio file of the podcast. The file will automatically start playing so you can listen to the episode.

Support the next season of “Unauthorized Disclosure” by donating here.

Below is an edited partial transcript of the conversation with Todd Miller.

Read more

US cops trained to use lethal Israeli tactics

My latest at The Electronic Intifada:

US police officers are being tutored by Israel on how to employ the tactics that have brought death and serious injury to huge numbers of Palestinians in the past few months.

Officers from 15 US police agencies recently traveled to the Middle East for lessons from their Israeli counterparts.

For 10 days in late November, police officers from New York, Miami, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s department, the Drug Enforcement Agency and US Customs and Border Protection observed the daily operations of the Jerusalem police, the Israeli Border Police and the Shin Bet secret service, all of which play a vital role in administering Israel’s system of control over Palestinians.

The training junket was hosted by the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), a neoconservative think tank that claims to have organized Israeli training sessions for some 9,500 law enforcement officials since 2004 through its Law Enforcement Exchange Program (LEEP).

Summary executions

Since 1 October, Israeli forces have killed more than 100 Palestinians, including at least 19 children, in what human rights groups have labeled a “clear pattern” of summary executions. Nineteen Israelis, one Palestinian and one American were killed by Palestinian attackers during the same period, it has been reported.

The Israeli human rights group B’Tselem placed the blame squarely on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for “the transformation of police officers, and even of armed civilians, into judges and executioner.”

Many were executed while posing no threat, like 13-year-old Hadil Wajih Awwad, who was running away when shot and lying injured when killed by armed Israeli men. Others, like community activist Lafi Awad, were unarmed when ambushed and executed by Israeli soldiers.

In some cases, knives were likely planted on Palestinians. In others, Israeli soldiers may have forced them to pick up knives.

Snuff films

Several of the killings have been caught on video, producing a seemingly endless stream of viral snuff films depicting the cold-blooded murder of people like Fadi AllounMahdi al-Muhtasib and Haftom Zarhum, to name just a few.

LEEP director and former assistant FBI director Steve Pomerantz told The Jerusalem Post that the goal of JINSA’s November delegation was to adopt these Israeli tactics for application in the US.

“Now Israel is experiencing a different type of terrorism – knifings and lone wolf attacks – for which there is almost no way to detect who will do it,” said Pomerantz, referring to the unorganized Palestinian revolt against Israel’s colonial violence.

“We’re learning a lot about how the police are responding to this latest change because Israel’s security agencies are always on the forefront on the fight against terrorists. Israel is the best at dealing with terrorism and we want to learn from your experience,” he added.

A similar phenomenon is playing out in the US, where viral videos of police murders are the new normal, from the executions of Samuel DuBose and Walter Scott to the slayings of Eric GarnerZachary Hammond and, most recently, Laquan McDonald.

While American police were getting schooled in Israeli execution tactics, dashcam footage of Chicago police officer Jason Van Dyke emptying his clip into 17-year-old Laquan McDonald was making headlines.

The video shows Van Dyke shooting McDonald, as he walks away from police, a total of 16 times in 15 seconds, thoroughly debunking police accounts that McDonald was lunging at officers with a knife when shot. The killing was so egregious that Van Dyke was charged with murder and Chicago police superintendent Garry McCarthy was fired, an incredibly rare outcome in the US, where, much like in Israel, impunity is the rule.

Churning out Zionists

Given the close relationship forged between US police departments and Israel’s security apparatus, the similarities in execution tactics should come as no surprise.

Under the cover of counterterrorism training, high-ranking officers from nearly every major US police department have traveled to Israel for lessons in occupation enforcement.

Van Dyke’s own department in Chicago participated in an Israeli training junket as recently as September, joining representatives from 14 other US police agencies for a weeklong annual seminar hosted by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).

Among the participants were officers from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the US Marshals Service, the US Naval Criminal Investigative Service and the International Association of Chiefs of Police. They were joined by senior police executives from Chicago, Las Vegas, Austin, Seattle, Oakland and Miami-Dade.

David Friedman, the ADL’s director of national law enforcement initiatives, told The Jerusalem Post that the objective of the trip was “to learn lessons from Israel in terms of tactics and strategies,” with the added benefit of churning out influential supporters for Israel’s colonial project.

Officers who take part “come back and they are Zionists,” boasted Friedman.


Beyond serving as an indoctrination conveyer belt, these training programs seek to reframe Israel’s conquest of Palestine as a campaign of law and order for US law enforcement to emulate.

Such a narrative positions Palestinians not as dispossessed and stateless, but as a pathologically dangerous population that must be controlled and pacified with brute force.

At the 2006 annual conference of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, Avi Dichter — the former head of Shin Bet who in 2002 ordered that a one-ton bomb be dropped on a Gaza City apartment building as part of an extrajudicial assassination — delivered an address on the “intimate connection between fighting criminals and fighting terrorists.”

According to Dichter, today’s cops are fighting a new class of super predators called “crimiterrorists.”

Dichter went on to emphasize the commonalities between the war on terror and the US war on drugs.

“The war against drug abuse is a global war involving all countries,” he said. “Similar to the war against terrorism … all means and methods must be used in the war against drugs, including intelligence cooperation between countries and agencies such as the United States and the DEA.”

Disposable people

What does the disastrous war on drugs have to do with a tiny Sparta state six thousand miles away?

As Michelle Alexander explains in her book The New Jim Crow, the rise of the war on drugs in the 1970s and 1980s coincided with the collapse of inner-city economies due to deindustrialization, globalization and advancements in technology that replaced low-skill labor, creating a new underclass completely shut out of the American economy.

The war on drugs essentially criminalized Blackness and poverty, fueling an explosion in mass incarceration.

“While earlier systems of control [slavery and Jim Crow] were designed to exploit and control black labor,” argues Alexander, “mass incarceration is designed to warehouse a population deemed disposable — unnecessary to the functioning of the new global economy.”

Who better to learn from than a state with decades of experience occupying and warehousing a population that has been deemed disposable?

In the post-9/11 era, Israel has helped facilitate the absolute convergence of the war on terror and war on drugs, just as Ditcher envisioned, with American police behaving as fully militarized occupying forces in poor Black neighborhoods. When residents attempt to resist their conditions, like they did in Ferguson and Baltimore, they are met with suppression tactics nearly indistinguishable from Israel’s occupation regime.

Since the beginning of this year, American police officers have killed 1,046 people, with Black victims accounting for a disproportionate number of the victims relative to the overall Black population.

Deadly police violence in the US is bad enough as it is. Adopting murderous Israeli tactics will only make it worse.

Israeli leaders exploit Paris attacks to justify atrocities against Palestinians

Crossposted from The Electronic Intifada

Since Islamic State operatives killed nearly 130 people in a series of  attacks across Paris on Friday, Israeli leaders have rushed to exploit the carnage to justify violence against Palestinians.

On the extreme end of the spectrum was Dov Lior, a prominent Israeli settler and rabbi, who celebrated the attacks as an appropriate punishment for the Holocaust.

“The wicked ones in blood-soaked Europe deserve it for what they did to our people 70 years ago,” said Lior.

As the attack was still underway, Israeli journalist Dan Margalit mocked the victims over the European Union’s decision to label products from Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank.

“In order to save lives we should send medical aid and food from the settlements for the victims of Arab terror in Paris. And we should provide them with shelter and rehabilitation services in Ariel,” tweeted Margalit, referring to one of the major settlements.

Meanwhile, some Israeli media outlets attempted to falsely link the Paris attacks to the Palestinian-led movement to boycott, divest from and sanction Israel.

Israel’s more mainstream leaders, right-wing as they are, didn’t cheer the attacks as Lior did, nor did they mock the victims or blame BDS. Instead, they used the Paris attacks as an opportunity to malign Palestinians, as they almost always do following major attacks in Western countries.

Masking colonial terror

For decades Israel has tried to sell its colonial conquest of Palestine as a war on Islamic terrorism. Indeed, the “war on terror” doctrine has long been pushed by Israel to justify atrocities against Palestinians. But it wasn’t until after 2001 that this framing really stuck.

Speaking at Bar Ilan University in 2008, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu boasted that Israel was “benefitting” from the 11 September 2001 al-Qaeda attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, which he credited with having “swung American public opinion in our favor.”

Israeli leaders hope the Paris attacks can play a similar role.

In the immediate aftermath of the attacks, Netanyahu, who oversaw the killing of 551 children in Gaza during the summer of 2014, released a statement condemning “militant Islamic terrorism” for “the deliberate and systematic targeting of civilians” from Paris to Jerusalem.

“As I’ve said for many years, militant Islamic terrorism attacks our societies because it wants to destroy our civilization and our values,” he said.

Drawing a connection where none exists, Netanyahu later told his cabinet that the killing of two settlers in the occupied West Bank “mere hours” before the Paris attacks was no different than the killings in France.

Since 1 October, Israeli forces have killed 80 Palestinians, including at least 15 children, dozens in what Amnesty International labeled a “clear pattern” of summary executions.

At least 12 Israelis have been killed by Palestinians in the same period, the predictable outcome of Israel’s ramped-up colonial violence.

Israeli leaders will exploit any opportunity to deflect from that reality while pushing the narrative that Israelis are blameless victims terrorized by Palestinians.

“In Israel, as in France, terrorism is terrorism and standing behind it is radical Islam and its desire to destroy its victims,” said Netanyahu in his cabinet address. “The time has come for countries to condemn terrorism against us to the same degree that they condemn terrorism everywhere else in the world.”

He went on to absolve Israel’s military occupation of any responsibility for fueling Palestinian violence, saying, “We should remember – we are not to blame for the terrorism directed against us, just as the French are not to blame for the terrorism directed against them. It is the terrorists who are to blame for terrorism, not the territories, not the settlements and not any other thing. It is the desire to destroy us that perpetuates this conflict and drives the murderous aggression against us.”

Israel’s brutality against Palestinians, who “have the same murderous intent as those in Paris,” is therefore justified, argued Netanyahu. “Thanks to our aggressive policy against terrorism – to control the ground, go into the villages, demolish terrorists’ homes and take preventive action against the infrastructures of terrorism – along with the determined action of the IDF [Israel’s military] and the security services in carrying out this policy, we succeed many times in frustrating and preventing more serious disasters.”

Cheering a third world war

Moshe Yaalon, the Israeli defense minister, openly fantasized that the Paris attacks would induce an erosion of European human rights.

“In the United States until the events of 11 September, the balance between security and human rights favored human rights on the issue, for example of eavesdropping on potential terrorists,” Yaalon told Israel’s Army Radio on Sunday.

“In France and other countries in Europe, that hasn’t yet happened,” he added. “Countries fighting terrorism have no alternative in this other than shifting in the direction of security. I assume that we will see a large number of steps [to carry out] inspections: passport inspections, inspections at the entrance to public places.”

Yaalon expressed a desire for Europe to emulate Israel, saying, “We as a democracy are experienced in fighting terrorism, used to it. The Western democracies in Europe will apparently need to include such steps in their countries too to defend themselves.”

Israeli leaders were similarly optimistic that Europe’s refugee crisis would generate a shift to the right modeled on Israel’s treatment of Palestinians.

But such a response would play right into the hands of Islamic State, which seeks to eliminate the “gray zone” of coexistence between Muslims and the West by spurring a hawkish response and anti-Muslim security measures. The idea, as stated by Islamic State in its official magazine, Dabiq, is that rising repression in the West, fueled by Islamic State’s attacks, will force Muslims “to escape persecution from the crusader governments and citizens.”

On Monday, Yaalon doubled down on his demagoguery, characterizing the Paris attacks as part of a new world war in which radical Islam is the enemy of the enlightened West.

“We’re already there [a third world war] for a while now,” Yaalon told Voice of Israel Radio. “There are those that bury their heads in the sand and try to define it as a social problem, or try to define it as something else. What we have is Jihadist Islam that is calling to destroy Western culture.”

Islamic State and Israel: shared interests

If anyone can relate to what the people of Paris are experiencing at the moment, it is not Israelis but rather the people of south Beirut, Palestinian refugees in the Yarmouk camp of Damascus, Syrians, Iraqis and many more Muslims and Arabs who make up the majority of Islamic State’s victims.

Islamic State has demonstrated that it is far more interested in attacking Israel’s adversaries, like Hizballah and Hamas (both of them condemned the Paris attacks) than in attacking Israel.

One day before the Paris attacks, Islamic State carried out a double suicide bombing in Bourj al-Barajneh, a predominantly Shiite neighborhood in southern Beirut, killing 43 people and wounding more than 200.

While Western media has rightly sympathized with Islamic State’s Parisian victims, the residential neighborhood targeted in Beirut was reduced to a “Hizballah stronghold,” language that effectively legitimizes the attack as one aimed at a military target and sends the message that the men, women and children who perished deserved their fate.

Some right-wingers even applauded the Beirut attack because they viewed it as a loss for Hizballah.

In fact, the only beneficiaries of Islamic State’s attacks seem to be Islamic State and the West’s hawks, whose nearly identical “clash of civilizations” ideologies feed off one another in what amounts to a symbiotic relationship.

The hawks, from Israel to the US, need Islamic State in order to justify more of the same destructive interventionism that gave rise to the fanatical death cult in the first place. And Islamic State needs a militaristic Western right wing to justify its propaganda about anti-Muslim crusaders.

Meanwhile, Israel is colluding with Europe’s right to capitalize on the disaster.

Hungary’s right-wing government, notorious for its bigoted cruelty toward refugees, is actively looking to adopt Israeli solutions to ensure its own demographic purity.

On Monday, Netanyahu met Peter Szijjarto, the Hungarian foreign minister, to discuss “security needs of their respective nations”, which, according to an Israeli government statement, included the “major challenges” posed by “mass migration from the Middle East into the heart of Europe,” Szijjarto has blamed such migration for the Paris attacks.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 78,367 other followers

%d bloggers like this: